![]() ![]() The RB6 seemed to be tailored for that all-important Q3, and had a incredible aero efficiency in the fast corners, but suffered in top speed and overtaking. The development over the arc of the season was also supreme, the quality of the staff, the team and the financial muscle payed really off. Both the car and the Renault engine had quite some reliability problems, but in the end the edge in sheer speed proved to be decisive. There is now shade of doubt that the RB6 was the fastest car on the grid. Should be interesting, I believe it will benefit in the long run those that have the true racing skills.Įdited: Damn I am a slow typist, everyone else beat me to it!Įdited by Black Widow, 15 November 2010 - 10:30. This additional 35kgs should help to offset some of the problems that existed in 2009. ![]() ![]() In 2011 this minimum requirement is 640kgs. In 2009 the cars were required to be a minimum of 605kgs. Though it's great that it provides more horsepower, KERS has major negative impacts on handling.I too believe that all teams were supposed to be using KERS but having read recently that some of the newer teams may not be using it because of the cost, I am now not so certain.Īs far as KERS is concerned, one of the problems in 2009 was the weight/balance of the cars. the two teams that ran KERS) performance was that year relative to their usual. In 2009 KERS was an overall disadvantage, as we saw with how abysmal Ferrari and McL (i.e. What I'm wondering is whether or not it will definitely have KERS.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |